On June 11, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., holding that Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act” or “Act”), does not provide an implied private right of action. In a 6-3 decision
Robert Pommer
Robert W. Pommer III is a partner in the Litigation Department and a member of Proskauer's Securities Litigation, White Collar Defense & Investigations groups and the Asset Management Litigation team.
Bob’s practice focuses on a broad range of securities-related enforcement and compliance issues. He represents private fund managers, financial institutions, public companies, and their senior executives in enforcement investigations and litigation conducted by the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice, and other governmental entities and financial services regulators. He also conducts internal investigations and counsels investment advisers and public companies on regulatory compliance, corporate governance and other SEC-related issues.
Prior to his career in private practice, Bob served as Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement for nine years. While there, he investigated and litigated several high-profile cases involving complex financial fraud and audit failures. Bob also worked on enforcement actions involving insider trading, investment adviser and broker-dealer issues, market manipulation and other violations of the federal securities laws.
CFTC Proposes New Framework for Event Contracts
On June 10, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposal”) related to event contracts traded on prediction markets, seeking public comments on proposed amendments to Rule 40.11 and the proposed addition of a new appendix. The Proposal outlines the framework through which the CFTC will review event…
Supreme Court Rejects “Pecuniary Loss” Requirement for SEC Disgorgement
On June 4, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Sripetch v. SEC, holding that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not need to prove that investors suffered pecuniary loss in order to obtain disgorgement. The decision resolves a circuit split and rejects the Second Circuit’s more restrictive approach articulated in…
SEC Rescinds “No-Deny” Settlement Policy: What Changes?
The SEC has rescinded Rule 202.5(e), the no-admit/no-deny policy originally adopted in 1972 that prohibited settling defendants from publicly denying the allegations in an SEC complaint or administrative order. The SEC can still settle cases on a no-admissions basis, and can still seek admissions in particular cases, but settling parties will no longer be…
Do Your Insider Trading Policies Cover The Prediction Markets? Should They?
Prediction markets now offer contracts tied directly to public company events—including stock price movements, earnings call language, regulatory outcomes, corporate announcements, and management decisions. These contracts are typically structured as event-based instruments rather than traditional securities. But for public companies, the practical question is straightforward: If employees are prohibited from trading securities on inside information, can they still bet on it?
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Section 47(b) Creates a Private Right of Action Under the Investment Company Act of 1940
Overview
On December 10, 2025, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. to resolve a circuit split and determine whether there is a private right of action for violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
SEC v. TZP Management Associates, LLC: Insights Into Private Fund Enforcement Priorities Under Chair Atkins
On August 15, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an order settling proceedings against TZP Management Associates, LLC (“TZP”) for allegedly miscalculating management fee offsets between 2018 and 2023. The SEC’s action, based solely on a non-scienter claim, underscores the SEC’s ongoing focus on management fee calculation practices, despite talk of deregulation and…
Seven Questions for Legal and Compliance Before Adopting AI Transcription Services
As businesses accelerate their use of automated tools to record and transcribe meetings, risks are growing. The use of these “AI tools” to transcribe meetings, such as witness interviews, expert network calls, investment committee meetings or advisory board discussions can transform ephemeral conversations into permanent records that can affect claims of privilege, complicate data governance…
The SEC Under Paul Atkins – What to Expect for Registered and Private Offerings, Climate-Related Disclosure, Consolidated Audit Trail, Digital Assets, and Agency Re-Organization
Paul Atkins, who has been nominated by President Trump to serve as Chairperson of the Securities & Exchange Commission, last week completed a short confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee. Despite its brevity, the hearing provided meaningful clues to Mr. Atkin’s plans if he is confirmed by the Senate to lead the SEC, which appears reasonably assured to occur. On April 3, 2025, the Senate Banking Committee approved his nomination with a vote 13 to 11.
Paul Atkins previously served on the staff of SEC Chairman Richard Breeden, as an SEC Commissioner from 2002 to 2008, and as a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP following the 2008 financial crisis. Most recently, he founded and ran a regulatory and compliance consulting company.
Beyond the Deal: How Do You Expect SEC Exams and Enforcement to Evolve in 2025?
As we head further into 2025, the landscape of SEC exams and enforcement is poised for significant shifts. How will the SEC adapt to emerging trends and evolving market dynamics? In the first issue of Beyond the Deal in 2025, four of our regulatory lawyers weigh in on what to expect. From new regulatory priorities…